+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct leads with 60.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on 8 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.3% across 3 benchmarks. Notable strengths include MMMU (75.4%), GPQA (74.2%), AIME 2024 (73.3%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (96.9%), GSM8k (96.8%), API-Bank (92.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 8 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:11.1%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Average Score:71.3%(+60.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
8 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:11.1%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Avg Score:71.3%(+60.1%)
Providers:8