+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct leads with 37.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.3% across 3 benchmarks. Notable strengths include MMMU (75.4%), GPQA (74.2%), AIME 2024 (73.3%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:15.9%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:53.3%(+37.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:15.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:53.3%(+37.4%)
Providers:0