+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads with 33.0% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B was introduced as a mid-sized variant in the Llama 3.2 family, designed to offer enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency. Built to provide a balanced option for applications requiring more than lightweight models but less than flagship sizes, it serves diverse use cases in the open-source community.
3 months newer
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:74.8%(+33.0%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Average Score:41.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
6 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:74.8%(+33.0%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Avg Score:41.8%
Providers:6