+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads with 28.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the 24B base model, designed to follow user instructions reliably. Built to serve general-purpose applications requiring moderate capability, it balances performance with deployment practicality.
9 days newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:74.2%(+28.9%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Average Score:45.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:74.2%(+28.9%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Avg Score:45.3%
Providers:2