+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads with 26.4% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base represents an updated iteration of the 24B foundation model, developed with architectural refinements and improved training. Built to provide enhanced base capabilities for fine-tuning, it incorporates learnings from previous versions for better downstream performance.
1 month newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:74.8%(+26.4%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Average Score:48.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
1 providers
Mistral AI
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:74.8%(+26.4%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Avg Score:48.4%
Providers:1