+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads with 22.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
1 month newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:74.8%(+22.2%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:52.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:74.8%(+22.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:52.6%
Providers:0