+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads with 14.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs. o1-mini is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini was created as a faster, more cost-effective reasoning model, designed to bring extended thinking capabilities to applications with tighter latency and budget constraints. Built to excel particularly in coding and STEM reasoning while maintaining affordability, it provides a more accessible entry point to reasoning-enhanced AI assistance.
4 months newer
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:74.2%(+14.2%)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:60.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:74.2%(+14.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:60.0%
Providers:2