+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs o3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 11.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3 represents the next generation in OpenAI's reasoning model series, developed to advance the capabilities of deliberate, step-by-step problem solving. Built to handle increasingly complex challenges across mathematics, science, and coding, it continues the evolution of reasoning-focused AI with improved analytical depth and accuracy.
2 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:74.3%
+
+
+
+
o3
Average Score:85.9%(+11.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3
2024-05-31
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o3
1 providers
OpenAI
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:74.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o3
Avg Score:85.9%(+11.6%)
Providers:1