+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs o3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 57.4% higher average benchmark score. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.3% across 3 benchmarks. Notable strengths include MMMU (75.4%), GPQA (74.2%), AIME 2024 (73.3%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3 is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.5% across 22 benchmarks. It excels particularly in COLLIE (98.4%), AIME 2024 (91.6%), ARC-AGI (88.0%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:10.1%
+
+
+
+
o3
Average Score:67.5%(+57.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3
2024-05-31
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o3
1 providers
OpenAI
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:10.1%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o3
Avg Score:67.5%(+57.4%)
Providers:1