+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 leads with 42.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.3% across 3 benchmarks. Notable strengths include MMMU (75.4%), GPQA (74.2%), AIME 2024 (73.3%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.0% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (84.8%), HumanEval+ (82.8%), HumanEval (82.6%). The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:14.9%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:57.2%(+42.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4
2024-06-01
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:14.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:57.2%(+42.4%)
Providers:1