+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads with 22.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the ultra-compact Phi-4 Mini architecture. Built to demonstrate that reasoning enhancements can be applied even to very small models, it brings analytical depth to resource-constrained environments.
3 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:74.2%(+22.2%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:52.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:74.2%(+22.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:52.0%
Providers:0