+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads with 5.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 72B was created as the flagship vision-language model in the Qwen 2.5 series, designed to provide advanced multimodal understanding. Built with 72 billion parameters optimized for visual and textual reasoning, it represents Qwen's most capable offering for tasks requiring integrated image and language processing.
5 days newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-01-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:75.4%(+5.2%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Average Score:70.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:75.4%(+5.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Avg Score:70.2%
Providers:0