+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 leads with 6.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B Thinking was developed as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the large-scale Qwen3 architecture. Built to combine deliberate analytical processing with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves tasks requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
6 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-07-25
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:74.2%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Average Score:81.1%(+6.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
1 providers
Novita
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:74.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Avg Score:81.1%(+6.9%)
Providers:1