+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads with 1.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Qwen3-Next 80B, designed to combine large-scale mixture-of-experts architecture with reliable instruction-following. Built to demonstrate efficient deployment of capable models, it balances advanced performance with practical computational efficiency.
7 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:74.2%(+1.3%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Average Score:72.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
1 providers
Novita
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:74.2%(+1.3%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Avg Score:72.9%
Providers:1