+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 3.7% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
2 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($0.13 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:68.1%(+3.7%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:64.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:68.1%(+3.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:64.4%
Providers:1