+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 57.3K more tokens in context window than Gemini 2.0 Flash. Gemini 2.0 Flash is $2.30 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
5 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($2.30 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input:$0.30
Output:$2.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:68.4%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:69.0%(+0.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:68.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:69.0%(+0.7%)
Providers:2