+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 57.3K more tokens in context window than Gemini 2.0 Flash. Both models have similar pricing. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
6 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:61.6%(+0.2%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:61.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:61.6%(+0.2%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:61.3%
Providers:1