+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemma 3 12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 11.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 794.6K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 12B. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
3 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($0.35 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:70.0%(+11.4%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:58.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:70.0%(+11.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:58.6%
Providers:1