+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemma 3 4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 22.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 794.6K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 4B. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
3 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Input:$0.02
Output:$0.04($0.44 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:70.0%(+22.2%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:47.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:70.0%(+22.2%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:47.8%
Providers:1