+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 32.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental version optimized for LiteRT deployment, designed to push the boundaries of on-device AI. Built to demonstrate the potential of running instruction-tuned models on mobile and edge devices, it represents ongoing efforts to make AI more accessible across hardware platforms.
5 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:59.1%(+32.6%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Average Score:26.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2024-06-01
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:59.1%(+32.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Avg Score:26.6%
Providers:0