+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 27.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
5 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:59.1%(+27.8%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:31.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:59.1%(+27.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:31.3%
Providers:0