Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 49.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 1.0M more tokens in context window than GPT-3.5 Turbo. Gemini 2.0 Flash is $1.50 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo was developed as an optimized version of GPT-3.5, designed to provide a balance of capability and efficiency for conversational and completion tasks. Built to serve as a cost-effective option for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it became widely adopted for chatbots, content generation, and general-purpose AI assistance.
1 year newer

GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21

Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.0 Flash

GPT-3.5 Turbo
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash

GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.0 Flash

GPT-3.5 Turbo

Gemini 2.0 Flash

GPT-3.5 Turbo

Gemini 2.0 Flash

GPT-3.5 Turbo
Azure
OpenAI