+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs GPT-4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 37.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 991.2K more tokens in context window than GPT-4. Gemini 2.0 Flash is $89.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
1 year newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($89.50 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Input:$30.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:75.9%(+37.1%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Average Score:38.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4
2022-12-31
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:75.9%(+37.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Avg Score:38.8%
Providers:2