+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs GPT-4.1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 leads with 4.2% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 offers 23.6K more tokens in context window than Gemini 2.0 Flash. Gemini 2.0 Flash is $9.50 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 represents an iterative improvement in the GPT-4 series, developed to refine the foundational capabilities established by GPT-4. Built to incorporate learnings and optimizations from the deployment of previous versions, it continues the evolution of OpenAI's flagship model line with enhanced reliability and performance.
4 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
GPT-4.1
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($9.50 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Input:$2.00
Output:$8.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:66.4%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Average Score:70.5%(+4.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1
2024-06-01
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:66.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Avg Score:70.5%(+4.2%)
Providers:1