+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs GPT-4o mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 17.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 912.4K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o mini. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4o Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4o, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications requiring faster response times and lower costs. Built to democratize access to advanced vision and text understanding, it enables developers to build sophisticated applications with reduced resource requirements.
4 months newer
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
2024-07-18
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($0.25 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:74.2%(+17.6%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Average Score:56.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4o mini
2023-10-01
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:74.2%(+17.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Avg Score:56.6%
Providers:1