Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 15.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 920.8K more tokens in context window than Grok-2. Gemini 2.0 Flash is $11.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.0 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.7% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Natural2Code (92.9%), MATH (89.7%), FACTS Grounding (83.6%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
xAI
Grok-2 is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 76.5% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (93.6%), HumanEval (88.4%), MMLU (87.5%). It supports a 136K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Grok-2
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 17 common benchmarks
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Grok-2
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Grok-2
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Grok-2
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Grok-2
xAI