Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 23.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 792.8K more tokens in context window than Grok-4. Gemini 2.0 Flash is $17.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.0 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.7% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Natural2Code (92.9%), MATH (89.7%), FACTS Grounding (83.6%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
xAI
Grok-4 is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (91.7%), HMMT25 (90.0%), GPQA (87.5%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Grok-4
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Grok-4
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
Grok-4
2024-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Grok-4
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Grok-4
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Grok-4
xAI
ZeroEval