Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 56.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 790.8K more tokens in context window than Grok Code Fast 1. Gemini 2.0 Flash is $1.20 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.0 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.7% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Natural2Code (92.9%), MATH (89.7%), FACTS Grounding (83.6%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1 is a language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.8% across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (70.8%). It supports a 266K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
2025-08-28
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Grok Code Fast 1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Grok Code Fast 1
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Grok Code Fast 1
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Grok Code Fast 1
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI