+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Kimi K2 0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 0905 leads with 6.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 532.5K more tokens in context window than Kimi K2 0905. Gemini 2.0 Flash is $2.60 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 was introduced as the second generation of Moonshot's language model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities across language understanding and generation. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in Moonshot's model offerings.
9 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($2.60 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:76.1%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Average Score:82.5%(+6.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:76.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Avg Score:82.5%(+6.4%)
Providers:2