Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct leads with 8.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 794.6K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 8B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.0 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.7% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Natural2Code (92.9%), MATH (89.7%), FACTS Grounding (83.6%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.3% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM-8K (CoT) (84.5%), ARC-C (83.4%), API-Bank (82.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 29 common benchmarks
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
2023-12-31
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together