+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 7.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.7% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Natural2Code (92.9%), MATH (89.7%), FACTS Grounding (83.6%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (91.1%), DocVQA (88.4%), ChartQA (83.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.05($0.40 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:41.3%(+7.9%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Average Score:33.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:41.3%(+7.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Avg Score:33.3%
Providers:6