Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 35.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
2 months newer

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepInfra