Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 10.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
5 days newer

Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together