+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 7.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.7% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Natural2Code (92.9%), MATH (89.7%), FACTS Grounding (83.6%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (92.1%), MGSM (91.1%), HumanEval (88.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 days newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20($0.10 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:45.6%(+7.8%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:37.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:45.6%(+7.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:37.8%
Providers:9