+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 leads with 4.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B was created through NVIDIA's optimization of Llama 3.3, designed to provide a balanced option with 49 billion parameters. Built to serve as a versatile mid-to-large-scale offering, it combines NVIDIA's customization expertise with Meta's foundation architecture.
3 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:62.1%
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Average Score:66.7%(+4.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
2023-12-31
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:62.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Avg Score:66.7%(+4.6%)
Providers:0