+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 10.0% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 18.9M more tokens in context window than Gemini 2.0 Flash. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
4 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30($0.12 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:66.8%(+10.0%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:56.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:66.8%(+10.0%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:56.8%
Providers:6