+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs MedGemma 4B IT
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 22.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.7% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Natural2Code (92.9%), MATH (89.7%), FACTS Grounding (83.6%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:43.3%(+22.9%)
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:20.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:43.3%(+22.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:20.5%
Providers:0