+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Mistral Small
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 991.2K more tokens in context window than Mistral Small. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small was created as an efficient model offering, designed to provide capable language understanding with reduced computational requirements. Built to serve cost-sensitive applications while maintaining quality, it enables Mistral's technology in scenarios where resource efficiency is valued.
2 months newer
Mistral Small
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($0.30 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.60
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1