+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 31.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Base was developed as a 24-billion-parameter foundation model, designed to serve as a base for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide a strong starting point for domain-specific applications, it represents an intermediate-scale option in Mistral's model lineup.
2 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:76.1%(+31.2%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Average Score:44.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
2023-10-01
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:76.1%(+31.2%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Avg Score:44.9%
Providers:0