+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs o1-preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-preview leads with 3.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 896.0K more tokens in context window than o1-preview. Gemini 2.0 Flash is $74.50 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-preview was introduced as an early version of OpenAI's reasoning model series, designed to demonstrate the potential of AI models that engage in extended thinking before responding. Built to solve complex problems through deliberate reasoning processes, it represented an initial step toward more thoughtful and analytical AI systems.
2 months newer
o1-preview
OpenAI
2024-09-12
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($74.50 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:75.9%
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Average Score:79.4%(+3.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:75.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Avg Score:79.4%(+3.5%)
Providers:2