+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs o3-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3-mini leads with 11.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 756.8K more tokens in context window than o3-mini. Gemini 2.0 Flash is $5.00 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o3-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3-mini was created as an efficient variant of the o3 reasoning model, designed to provide advanced thinking capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make next-generation reasoning accessible to a broader range of applications, it balances analytical depth with practical speed and cost considerations.
2 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
o3-mini
OpenAI
2025-01-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($5.00 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Input:$1.10
Output:$4.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:75.9%
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Average Score:87.5%(+11.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3-mini
2023-09-30
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:75.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Avg Score:87.5%(+11.6%)
Providers:2