Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 34.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Phi-3.5-mini-instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Mini was developed by Microsoft as a small language model designed to deliver impressive performance despite its compact size. Built with efficiency in mind, it demonstrates that capable language understanding and generation can be achieved with fewer parameters, making AI more accessible for edge and resource-constrained deployments.
3 months newer

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23

Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Azure