+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 29.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 920.6K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
2 months newer
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($0.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:80.2%(+29.9%)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:50.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:80.2%(+29.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:50.3%
Providers:1