+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct leads with 4.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.7% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Natural2Code (92.9%), MATH (89.7%), FACTS Grounding (83.6%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.9% across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (92.7%), GSM8k (91.1%), MBPP (90.2%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.09($0.32 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 25 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:34.7%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Average Score:39.0%(+4.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:34.7%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:39.0%(+4.3%)
Providers:4