+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 12.1% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 7B was developed as an efficient vision-language model, designed to provide multimodal understanding with minimal computational requirements. Built with 7 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it serves applications requiring practical vision-language capabilities with constrained resources.
1 month newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-01-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:70.7%(+12.1%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Average Score:58.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 183 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:70.7%(+12.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Avg Score:58.6%
Providers:0