+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemini Diffusion
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads with 14.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion was developed as a specialized model for image generation, designed to create high-quality visual content through diffusion-based techniques. Built to complement the text and multimodal capabilities of the Gemini family, it extends Google's AI capabilities into creative visual generation tasks.
28 days newer
Gemini Diffusion
2025-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:52.2%(+14.8%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Average Score:37.3%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Coding31.6%(+8.7%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Coding22.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:52.2%(+14.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Avg Score:37.3%
Providers:0