+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 2 9B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 9B leads with 17.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 2 9B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FACTS Grounding (84.1%), Global-MMLU-Lite (81.1%), MMMU (72.9%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.0%), BoolQ (84.2%), HellaSwag (81.9%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
11 months newer
Gemma 2 9B
2024-06-27
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 29 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:18.3%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Average Score:35.7%(+17.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:18.3%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Avg Score:35.7%(+17.4%)
Providers:0