+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 34.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 852.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FACTS Grounding (84.1%), Global-MMLU-Lite (81.1%), MMMU (72.9%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), IFEval (90.4%), MATH (89.0%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($0.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 34 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:15.6%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:50.0%(+34.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:15.6%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:50.0%(+34.4%)
Providers:2