Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 4B leads with 24.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 852.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 4B. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemma 3 4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FACTS Grounding (84.1%), Global-MMLU-Lite (81.1%), MMMU (72.9%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
Gemma 3 4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (90.2%), GSM8k (89.2%), DocVQA (75.8%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemma 3 4B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 34 common benchmarks
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemma 3 4B
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemma 3 4B
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemma 3 4B
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemma 3 4B
DeepInfra