+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed leads with 2.8% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FACTS Grounding (84.1%), Global-MMLU-Lite (81.1%), MMMU (72.9%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. Notable strengths include HumanEval (66.5%), MMLU (60.1%), Global-MMLU-Lite (59.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 days newer
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 27 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:19.7%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:22.5%(+2.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:19.7%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:22.5%(+2.8%)
Providers:0