+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads with 29.1% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
28 days newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:57.3%(+29.1%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:28.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:57.3%(+29.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:28.2%
Providers:0